18 Comments
User's avatar
Leaf Seligman's avatar

Another insightful conversation. Thanks so much, Rachel. I listened this morning after a conversation with American and Canadian friends the night before in Waterloo,ON, where a Pro-Palestine rally was happening. A Canadian friend raised in Zambia who has studied protests noted that everywhere beyond North America protests are meant to disrupt. She noted in Canada people stay on the sidewalk and follow the rules. In the USA, a relatively small number of people gather on the highway in LA and Trump sends the National Guard. Driverless cars get destroyed and Marines arrive.

Like you, Rachel, I consider every being a co-constituent part of the body of earth. We are connected kin and the constant siege of the body of earth requires self defense. As someone who has always considered myself a pacifist, I am usefully challenged to ask how to engage in defending the sacred body of earth (all the bodies that comprise it: arboreal, botanical, animal, mineral, aquatic) in ways that do not cause more harm. I appreciate the complexity and clarity you invite us to swim in.

Expand full comment
Mathew's avatar

Rowan is a legend. I stayed in the same protest safe-house as her a few years back, though unfortunately was far too tired to have much conversation. I have so much to say on this subject. Clearly there are limits to what nonviolence can do. In the context of a genocidal force willing to indiscriminately murder civilians I doubt it can help. But until we are directly facing that level of violence, I think nonviolence has its place.

There are certainly interesting discussions about the abuse of terminology. When the state's definition of violence includes property damage (even when there's no risk of harm to people), but not oppression and imprisonment (so long as they are the ones doing it), what does it even mean in that context? I believe this is why Palestine Action didn't define itself as such. But I think it’s worth holding to our own definitions, to retain control of the narrative.

Nonviolence is a disciplined commitment to proudly standing up against authority in a way that allows us to retain our humanity, avoids causing harm to people, and helps us keep each other safe. It avoids the passivity and obedience of peaceful protest, which has sadly become ineffective in the UK as authorities have decided to simply ignore it. It also avoids the escalation towards ever more violence that we're unlikely to win, since we don’t have the power of the state.

The real power that nonviolence gives us is the opportunity for mass mobilisation. Once things have escalated too far towards violence, many people will simply submit to authority out of fear, and only a few will risk their lives. But by avoiding that escalation, we can maintain a relatively safe movement space that still massively disrupts the establishment system using a wide variety of tactics that millions of people can join in with. Not everyone has to engage in direct action, there are many support roles needed, but there is also noncompliance, strikes, boycotts, etc.

Apart from disrupting the current power, there's also a second side of what might be called nonviolent resistance, which is building the alternative e.g. through mutual aid, and alternative economies which reduce financial power over us, training and educating, and creating processes to make & hold clear demands or visions for the future that people can support, without the movement being appropriated.

And while the establishment massively clamps down on us, unlike peaceful protest which submits, a nonviolence movement can use that to our advantage. When Trudi Warner was arrested for holding a placard upholding jury equity, the Defend Our Juries movement was born. When more were arrested for holding the same sign, hundreds more sat down to replicate the action until it became clear that they couldn't arrest us all. When hard-core activists like Palestine Action are proscribed, the comparatively easier action of being arrested for a terrorism offence for holding a sign becomes possible, and in its absurdity and obvious injustice, the authority turns more people against it.

If on the other hand Palestine Action had responded to being called terrorists, by saying “we might as well commit acts of terrorism then”, they would have immediately lost all support, and the public would have rallied behind more authoritarianism.

Ultimately to even survive the multiple crises we're facing, we will have to go through some form of revolution to force the rich and powerful to surrender their wealth and power. This won’t be easy, but we need to remember how much they depend on us and our compliance, and the compliance of their enforcers. In most cases, police forces and armies tend not to like firing on unarmed civilians, especially if they think their families might be in the crowd. With a violent revolution we have no idea who might be hurt or where it might end, and it has an even chance of leaving us suffering under a different tyranny as of freeing us. But if we can maintain nonviolence and achieve a mass movement revolution, working to create a new democracy as we go, I think we have a better chance of getting out the other end.

Expand full comment
Obsolete Optics's avatar

Nonviolence protects the state and enables its monopoly on violence. In order to be peaceful, you must be capable of great violence. If you are not capable of violence, you are not peaceful, just harmless. Important distinction. Hope this helps! 🙏

Expand full comment
Mathew's avatar

No, this is a misunderstanding of nonviolence. What you're referring to is being peaceful, passive, or obedient. Nonviolence is something separate from both violence and passivity. It has the power to be enormously disruptive to establishment systems through direct action, - this can be anything from mass non-compliance with laws making them unenforceable, to carefully planned property damage of critical infrastructure. But the important thing is it avoids causing harm to people or an escalation further into violence, so that when the state does use violence it can more obviously be seen as unjust, and then by doing so the establishment powers turn a greater proportion of the public against themselves.

Expand full comment
David Angell-Paulo's avatar

Exciting News: Groundbreaking Environmentally Friendly Power Station

I wanted to share some exciting news—our team has developed a revolutionary new environmentally friendly 1.2 gigawatt power station with a built-in Data centre and to reach the Net Zero targets . This innovative technology is so advanced that it effectively fills the gaps of traditional wind and solar farms. The new system generates clean energy more efficiently and reliably, representing a significant leap forward in sustainable power generation assisted by 30% waste-to-energy. I look forward to telling you more about its capabilities and the positive impact it will have on the future of renewable energy.

David Angell Paulo

AUSTS Power Plants PTY LTD.

davidangellpaulo@austsecology.com

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Violent protests are basically guerilla warfare against military occupation and aggression.

non-violent protests, on the other hand, are public messaging. They provide a means for politicians and everybody else to see where citizens stand and what they want.

so, once you start a war - it's hard to stop one. Let the otherside start it. That way you will be on the moral side of the conflict when it ends. The ones who started it will be held to account.

Until war has been declared by Trump, keep protests non-violent and peaceful. Otherwise, Trump will declare you are the reason marshal (military) law has to be enacted.

Expand full comment
Yakutat@‘94's avatar

The cracks are emerging in the network

Expand full comment
Robin Lunn's avatar

I believe it is critical that we use confrontational non violence. Read the Dandelion Insurrection Trilogy to see how we can imagine this in our current reality.

AND, we must look at a much longer time line. Talking about the International Charter for Human Rights is to ignore what was before that and how much so many Dictators want to return to a pre-WWII internationalism. It also ignores how many brown and black communities have never been a part of that "civilized" world-view.

It is time to imagine a pre and post modern strategy that uses non western ideas (right brain?) To disrupt the western system.

Expand full comment
Jesse's avatar

~~~~~~~~🌏🤜👊🤛✊🌏~~~~~~~~~~~~

modern hieroglyphs

Expand full comment
Jesse's avatar

♾️🌏♾️

Expand full comment
Brian Vargecko's avatar

Wonderful episode! I’ve been struggling a lot with these notions lately. As a practicing Buddhist where non-violence is sort of our jam, I’ve been wondering how far on the scale we can consider our protest actions or activism self (or communal) defense. The Buddha never said you have to take a punch. It’s our motives and intentions that are important. We don’t want to intentionally harm but we can defend, we can protect. It just feels like we’re losing and more is required than simply practicing Metta. This episode helped clarify some things for me, reaffirmed my belief that non-violence must be the way only we need to define it better, such a great guest, thank you bunches Rachel.

🙏 ❤️✌️

Expand full comment
subcomandante Felix's avatar

Any discussion of the pros and cons of violent versus nonviolent resistance should be cognizant of an overriding framework. Violence is fundamentally a gender issue. That is, over the last 8,000 years or so, violence, physical and linguistic, has overwhelmingly been perpetrated by men. I would also add that this violence has largely been used to establish and maintain a male-supremacy hierarchy – NOT to protect or defend society or its most vulnerable members. The second critically important context is that the cost of violent resistance, even justified, has been devastatingly (e.g. Gaza) borne by women and children, along with those men who eschew violence.

Expand full comment
Sweet Ωme's avatar

Get Sally and her mum on!

Expand full comment
Richard Bergson's avatar

I like the way the form reflected the content. That was a masterclass in non-violence in the context of an interview. Vulnerability with edge, curiosity with respect - human values that remind us who we are as a group whatever our differences. A great interview!

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

By dog tprok padticipatint

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

Yes

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

hey guys, keep up the pressure against the crazy men spiraling in the horror regime

🍁 We can do this, Elbows UP!

the next nation wide protest is being organized by 50501:

Saturday August 2nd 2025

RAGE against the REGIME

https://www.rageagainsttheregime.org/

THATS IN THREE DAYS!

We are the freight train.

🚂🇨🇦🇬🇧🇫🇷🇯🇵🇦🇺🇩🇪🇺🇦🇸🇳🇳🇱🇰🇷🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇻🇦

Nationwide 'Rage Against the Regime' Protest Planned for August 2

https://www.newsweek.com/rage-against-regime-protest-jeffrey-epstein-trump-2104497

🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁

2CELLOS - Hysteria [OFFICIAL VIDEO]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gHbwAd5gkMM

🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁

Keep protests peaceful.

Don't kill anyone.

Here are resistance related guides from around the world:

🇺🇸 Fundamentals of physical surveillance: a guide for uniformed and plainclothes personnel

https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofph0000silj

The RCMP has its own publications including:

🇨🇦 GCPSG-022 (2025) - Threat and Risk Assessment Guide

GCPSG-010 (2022) - Operational Physical Security Guide

🇨🇦 GCPSG-019 (2023) - Protection, Detection, Response, and Recovery Guide

https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/physec-secmat/pubs/index-eng.htm

The non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation also has excellent guides on:

🇺🇸 Street Level Surveillance

https://sls.eff.org

🇺🇸 Surveillance Self-Defense

https://ssd.eff.org/

🇪🇺 🇸🇪⚠️ Resistance Operating Concept

https://jsou.edu/Press/PublicationDashboard/25

🇺🇦 🇺🇲 Radio Free Ukraine Resistance Manual

https://radiofreeukraine.com/3d-flip-book/resistance-manual/

⚠️ John Hopkins University:

Assessing Revolutionary And Insurgent Strategies (ARIS) Studies

This one is used a lot by ICE, so the Trump Regime keeps suppressing it. Here are alternate links as it keeps getting moved around by the good guys:

Small Wars Journal

Assessing Revolutionary and Insurgent Strategies (ARIS) Project

https://archive.smallwarsjournal.com/blog/assessing-revolutionary-and-insurgent-strategies-aris-project

Author's website:

On Resistance, Revolutions, and Insurgencies

https://zimmerer.typepad.com/resistance/

Free PDF download of the book from the original author:

Casebook on Insurgency and Revolutionary Warfare, Volume II 1962 - 2009

http://zimmerer.typepad.com/Documents/ARIS%20Casebook%20Vol%202%202012%20s.pdf

⚠️ Civilian-Based Defense: A Post-Military Weapons System

https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/civilian-based-defense-a-post-military-weapons-system/

🏁 Simple Sabotage Field Manual by United States Office of Strategic Services

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184?ref=404media.co

⚠️ Library of Congress

Revelations from the Russian archives: documents in English translation

https://www.loc.gov/item/96024752

🏁 Robert Reich/Resistance School

Communicating Across Difference

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaT8gjnOmQl3dguy0_E0vVCL5ZYEyCTzu

🏁 Bernie Sanders:

https://m.youtube.com/@BernieSanders

🏁 CPJ Committee to Protect Journalists:

Safety Kit

https://cpj.org/safety-kit/

🏁 Activist Handbook:

https://activisthandbook.org/introduction

(⚠️ These are USA sponsered websites. Some publications may have been removed by the Trump regime)

Expand full comment
Rachel Donald's avatar

Thank you for posting all these resources!

Expand full comment