Your premise has a major and consequential mistake concerning the consequences of policy. Your claim that there is a “free market” out there and it has been some help implemented to the carbon and everything associated with it market sector is incorrect. I can only speak for United States because that is the only macroeconomy that I have a detailed knowledge of, but the only free market in this country is in some park or parking lot on Saturday morning usually referred to as a “farmers market”
Your premise has a major and consequential mistake concerning the consequences of policy. Your claim that there is a “free market” out there and it has been some help implemented to the carbon and everything associated with it market sector is incorrect. I can only speak for United States because that is the only macroeconomy that I have a detailed knowledge of, but the only free market in this country is in some park or parking lot on Saturday morning usually referred to as a “farmers market”
Hi, in your first paragraph, did you mean:
-State response to the interlocking climate.....
-We have a name for this terrible violence.....